ANALISIS YURIDIS UNDANG-UNDANG NOMOR 19 TAHUN 2019 TENTANG KOMISI PEMBERANTASAN KORUPSI TERHADAP KINERJA KOMISI PEMBERANTASAN KORUPSI

Asra Afifah Afis, Davit Rahmadan, Elmayanti Elmayanti

Abstract


This research raises the background of the problem regarding Law Number 19 of 2019
regarding amendments to Law Number 30 of 2002 concerning the Corruption Eradication
Commission, which discusses the challenges, first, the influence of Law Number 19 of 2019 on the
performance of the Corruption Eradication Commission. Second, regarding the weaknesses of the
Corruption Eradication Commission in Law Number 19 of 2019 compared to Law Number 30 of
2002 and its impact on law enforcement officers. Third, regarding the legal reforms needed to
optimize the duties and responsibilities of the Corruption Eradication Commission.
This study aims to: first, to analyze the effect of Law Number 19 of 2019 concerning the
Corruption Eradication Commission on the performance of the Corruption Eradication
Commission. Second, to find out the weaknesses of the Corruption Eradication Commission in Law
Number 19 of 2019 compared to Law Number 30 of 2002 and its impact on law enforcement.
Third, to find out the legal reforms needed to optimize the duties and responsibilities of the
Corruption Eradication Commission.
This research uses normative legal research methods, namely library law research. In
connection with the type of research used, namely normative research, the approach used is a
statutory approach and a conceptual approach.In this study the authors conducted research on
legal principles, namely the legal principle of proportionality is a legal principle that seeks to
balance the actions taken with the goals to be achieved.
From the results of this study, it can be concluded that the enactment of Law Number 19 of
2019 concerning the Corruption Eradication Commission, which was originally intended to
improve the performance of the KPK, can actually be said otherwise. The KPK is no longer an
independent institution based on Article 1 paragraph 3 because it has been supervised by an
executive agency. Board. The KPK supervisors become an organizational unit with the KPK
(Article 21 paragraph 1) so that the institutions are not independent because they are still one
institution so that the check and balance function is very doubtful. (Article 37E paragraph 1 and
paragraph 10).
Keywords: KPK – AnalysisLaw Number 19 of 2019- KPK performance.

Full Text:

PDF

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.