TINJAUAN YURIDIS TERHADAP PERUBAHAN PERATURAN DAERAH KOTA PEKANBARU NOMOR 7 TAHUN 2017 TENTANG RENCANA PEMBANGUNAN JANGKA MENENGAH DAERAH (RPJMD) TAHUN 2017-2022
Abstract
In carrying out regional development, the government requires good and
accurate development planning. Consistency and directed planning based on data
which is an integral part of the regional planning process, it is accurate with the
details of the terms and conditions of the Regional RPJM which are regulated in
detail in the Domestic Regulation Number 86 of 2017. The methods and
requirements of regional development planning must refer to the contained in the
legislation on development planning in order to ensure consistency and the
achievement of the objectives of development planning in the regions. In the Draft
Regional Regulation Number 7 of 2017 concerning the Regional Medium-Term
Development Plan (RPJMD) in Pekanbaru City which revised there were several
problems which if viewed the implementation of the plenary meeting was not in
accordance with the laws and regulations and government regulation 12 of 2018
concerning guidelines for the preparation of rules and regulations. Regional
People's Representative Council so that no decision can be taken and the Draft
Regional Regulation on the RPJMD which was proposed by the Mayor to the
Governor of Riau Province in fact still exists.
This research is a sociological juridical legal research, namely a
research approach that emphasizes the legal aspects (laws and regulations)
regarding the subject matter to be discussed, associated with the reality in the field.
This study uses primary data sources consisting of primary, secondary, and tertiary
legal materials.
From the results of the research and discussion carried out, there are several
conclusions obtained, namely: First, when viewed from the political aspect, the
amendment to the regional regulation Number 7 of 2017 concerning the RPJMD
has different views of the factions in the process of changing the regional
regulation, which has generated a lot of prolonged controversy that is not yet clear.
direction and urgency in making changes. And if viewed from a sociological aspect,
changes to the RPJMD must be adjusted to the RPJPD and other national regional
development direction documents, as well as the formation of the medium-term
planning of the Pekanbaru City area that has not been fully implemented based on
Permendagri Number 86 of 2017 in the formation of amendments to Regional
Regulation Number 7 of 2017 concerning RPJMD.
Keywords: RPJMD – Regional Development – Regional Regulatio
accurate development planning. Consistency and directed planning based on data
which is an integral part of the regional planning process, it is accurate with the
details of the terms and conditions of the Regional RPJM which are regulated in
detail in the Domestic Regulation Number 86 of 2017. The methods and
requirements of regional development planning must refer to the contained in the
legislation on development planning in order to ensure consistency and the
achievement of the objectives of development planning in the regions. In the Draft
Regional Regulation Number 7 of 2017 concerning the Regional Medium-Term
Development Plan (RPJMD) in Pekanbaru City which revised there were several
problems which if viewed the implementation of the plenary meeting was not in
accordance with the laws and regulations and government regulation 12 of 2018
concerning guidelines for the preparation of rules and regulations. Regional
People's Representative Council so that no decision can be taken and the Draft
Regional Regulation on the RPJMD which was proposed by the Mayor to the
Governor of Riau Province in fact still exists.
This research is a sociological juridical legal research, namely a
research approach that emphasizes the legal aspects (laws and regulations)
regarding the subject matter to be discussed, associated with the reality in the field.
This study uses primary data sources consisting of primary, secondary, and tertiary
legal materials.
From the results of the research and discussion carried out, there are several
conclusions obtained, namely: First, when viewed from the political aspect, the
amendment to the regional regulation Number 7 of 2017 concerning the RPJMD
has different views of the factions in the process of changing the regional
regulation, which has generated a lot of prolonged controversy that is not yet clear.
direction and urgency in making changes. And if viewed from a sociological aspect,
changes to the RPJMD must be adjusted to the RPJPD and other national regional
development direction documents, as well as the formation of the medium-term
planning of the Pekanbaru City area that has not been fully implemented based on
Permendagri Number 86 of 2017 in the formation of amendments to Regional
Regulation Number 7 of 2017 concerning RPJMD.
Keywords: RPJMD – Regional Development – Regional Regulatio
Full Text:
PDFRefbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.