TANGGUNG JAWAB HUKUM PENGURUS KOPERASI ATAS KERUGIAN KOPERASI (STUDI KASUS PADA KUD BERKAT RIDHO DESA KIJANG MAKMUR KECAMATAN TAPUNG HILIR KABUPATEN KAMPAR TAHUN 2005-2012)

Abstract

The object of study in this study is about the legal responsibilities of
cooperative managers for cooperative losses. Where legal responsibility here is
not only the responsibility to replace the losses suffered by the cooperative, but
also the responsibility to be examined and tried if the case is legally verified.
Various cases and previous studies have illustrated that often a legal entity such
as a cooperative suffers losses, including due to errors in terms of management.
But as long as the author's observations, often these losses are borne jointly by all
members, even though these losses are caused by mismanagement by the
cooperative management. The purpose of this study is to get an overview of how
the KOPSA management's responsibilities form Thanks to Ridho for cooperative
losses. In addition, how was the effort to complete the law against the KOPSA
management, Thanks to Ridho, who had made a loss to the cooperative. The
research method used in this study is the Sociological method. The data obtained
is data that describes how the losses incurred in the cooperative are also how the
responsibilities of the cooperative management and how the legal settlement of
the management has made a loss to the cooperative.
Then the data will be analyzed based on existing regulations and concluded
in a description. Through in-depth research, this research gets results, that there
are deviations in management, borrowing money without considering the
feasibility and ability of the borrower. The existence of these deviations caused a
loss to the KOPSA Thanks to Ridho, but the management was not responsible and
resigned from the management. The second thing found in this study, namely the
management does not hold the principle of healthy lending, because the
knowledge and abilities of the management are very weak. Legal settlement
efforts are not carried out and an internal resolution is chosen, namely through
Case Bleaching, which is expected to make the cooperative develop again
regardless of the shadow of the problem. From this, it can be concluded that the
losses caused by management errors by the management, but here the board did
not want to be responsible at all. Legal remedies can actually be made due to
these deviations, but eventually the case is resolved internally, by carrying out
Case Bleaching.
Keywords: Responsibility, Administrator, Cooperative and Cooperative Losses