ANALISIS TERHADAP GARIS-GARIS BESAR HALUAN NEGARA SEBAGAI WUJUD PENGUATAN FUNGSI LEMBAGA MAJELIS PERMUSYAWARATAN RAKYAT REPUBLIK INDONESIA

Abstract

The urgency of the re-enactment of the GBHN was triggered due to the
disappointment of many parties related to the development process whose output
and output were not in accordance with what was mandated by the constitution.
The development process is seen to be overemphasized on the limited perspective
of the President or Regional Head elected, resulting in disparities in the
development process in various regions. GBHN is mentioned as a manifestation of
sovereignty that is concrete in terms of its formation process, GBHN is mentioned
as strengthening the principles of Check and Balances, GBHN is said to prove
capable of realizing more successful, consistent and sustainable national
development. The planning of development programs stipulated by the MPR in the
GBHN has in fact not been realized systemically. The evaluation of the MPR
before setting the last GBHN in the transition from the New Order government to
the reform era stated that development during the New Order era was only
focused on the economic sector and was not matched by progress in other sectors.
Physically visible progress in the economic sector but fundamentally fragile
because it does not have a clear legal basis, the law is far behind. Thus the
assumption that chaos and lack of guidance in development in Indonesia has
actually been answered by the existence of RPJPN as a substitute for GBHN.
Keywords: GBHN – Check and Balances – Fundamental Fragile