IMPLEMENTASI PERLINDUNGAN HUKUM TERHADAP KONSUMEN PEMERIKASAAN MATA PADA OPTIKAL YANG TIDAK MEMILIKI TENAGA REFRAKSIONIS OPTISIEN DI KOTA PEKANBARU

Abstract

Humans as living things have various needs. Today, human needs are increasingly varied and
things that were not too important have become very important. Examples can be seen in everyday life,
namely handheld smartphones, laptops and televisions. Almost all aspects use the item. The increasing need
for these items can have a negative effect on eye health. Besides the bad habits of watching television too
long, staring at a laptop screen or taking too long a smartphone which is an electronic digital device can
potentially cause interference with vision (refraction abnormalities).
This study is a sociological juridical legal research, what is meant by sociological juridical
research is an approach by looking in terms of legislation and the reality that occurs in the field, in
accordance with the formulation of the problems expressed by the author. . While the population and sample
are parties related to the problems examined in this study, the data sources used, primary data, secondary
data, and tertiary data. The technique of collecting data in this study was through interviews and literature
review.
From the results of the research that the authors did, it can be concluded, first the implementation
of legal protection against consumers eye examination on Optics who do not have Optional Refractionists in
Pekanbaru, namely: still not optimally implemented, there are still many optics that perform eye
examination without Optional Refraction, the second is the Optical Responsibility of consumers of eye
examinations at Optics who do not have Optional Refraction in the City of Pekanbaru, namely: there are
still many Optics that have not provided maximum accountability.
Keywords : Implementation - Legal Protection - Eye Examination - Optional Refraction Power.