Tinjauan Tentang Larangan Praktik Monopoli dan Persaingan Usaha Tidak Sehat Terhadap Dominasi Penjualan Rokok Merek Sampoerna di Wilayah Kecamatan Kampar Timur

Abstract

On the basis of article 4 paragraph (1) of Act No. 5 Of 1999 Year Antitrust explained that
businessmen are prohibited from making agreements with other businessmen to jointly conduct a mastery of
the production and marketing of the goods or and or service can result in the occurrence of monopolistic
practices and/or unhealthy business competition, it is in accordance with the activities of the banned Party
conducted the Sampoerna represented by the agent. Party Sampoerna has conducted cooperation with the
store owner who is Kampar Sub-district of Eastern region, that businessmen who had made that agreement
will not receive promotional materials from other businessmen or smoking other stores only focus on the
promotional materials of the Sampoerna only. Activities performed by the Treaty the sampoerna party
contrary to the contents of article 19 of the Act number 5 Year 1999 regarding mastery of the market
explains the businessmen are prohibited from performing one or more activities, either alone or other
businessmen jointly led to competition and antitrust practice efforts is not healthy. The purpose of writing
this thesis, namely; First, figure out the implementation of the rights and obligations held the trade
monopoly and competition practices pose a business isn't healthy, secondly, knowing the legal efforts result
from the cooperation agreement.
This type of research can be classified in types of sociological research, because in this study the
authors direct research on the location or place a complete thorough in order to give a complete and clear
picture of the problems researched.
From the results of the research there are two staples that can be summed up: first, the
implementation of the rights and obligations of trade raises monopoly and competition of unhealthy
businesses and the implementation of Act No. 5 of year 1999 has not yet been fully realised due to lack of
understanding of the people against the monopolistic practices Act. Second, efforts are being made in the
pelaksaan Agreement committed the parties Sampoerna which resulted in competition and antitrust
practices effort was to provide socialization to society who do not understand about violations in agreement
to the detriment of other businessmen as indicated in Act No. 5 of year 1999, later for businessmen who do
practice prohibited monopolies should be given strict sanctions by the relevant agencies of the Government,
through the the authorized institution such as the Commission's competition Watchdog's efforts to supervise
and investigate the behavior of businesses that practise a monopoly.